27 October 2014 to 4 September 2014
¶ In Harper's · 27 October 2014 listen/tech
I make a very sidebarred appearance in the November 2014 Harper's Magazine Readings section (page 21), where they list some of the genres that amused them in my genre map. The choices seem a little random to me (why is "Yugoslav rock" funny?), and I can't explain why they felt "Viking" had to be capitalized, but it's cool to appear in a magazine I actually used to read.
¶ The Sounds of Cities · 23 October 2014 listen/tech
I had limited expectations for applying the logic from The Sounds of Places, which is based on whole countries, to individual cities. Cities are smaller than countries, and data-wise, smaller usually means more random.
And maybe there is more randomness, overall, but there's enough non-randomness to be intriguing. Or, to put this another way, any chance that I wouldn't publish this evaporated when The Sound of Dundee turned out to, in fact, include the immortal "The Unicorn Invasion of Dundee" by Gloryhammer.
The Sounds of US Cities
The Sounds of European Cities
And maybe there is more randomness, overall, but there's enough non-randomness to be intriguing. Or, to put this another way, any chance that I wouldn't publish this evaporated when The Sound of Dundee turned out to, in fact, include the immortal "The Unicorn Invasion of Dundee" by Gloryhammer.
The Sounds of US Cities
The Sounds of European Cities
¶ (Almost) No One Is Immune · 21 October 2014 listen/tech
At work I've been looking at the distinctive collective music listening of individual US cities. A lot of this, as you might imagine, turns out to be local music from in or near each city, or pop music with some sort of regional connection.
But statistically, the most popular "national" hits tend to get mixed in with the local stuff at some point, through sheer ubiquity. Taylor Swift's "Shake It Off" is the most obvious example of this at the moment, a song so popular that it's basically representative of the distinctive listening of humans, or at least of American humans who use Spotify.
For amusement, though, here is a ranking of major US Cities by where on their most-distinctive current song chart "Shake It Off" ranks as of today. The cities at the top are the ones who have surrendered most unreservedly to "Shake It Off", either through genuine disproportionate enthusiasm, and/or because they just don't have anything better of their own to play. The ones at the bottom have maintained the strongest resistance to this invasion. The >100s at the very bottom show the cities where immunity is so strong that "Shake It Off" doesn't even make the top 100 most-distinctive songs.
Presumably none of this will bother Taylor, but "people who are not going to listen disproportionately are going to not listen disproportionately" wouldn't fit the meter of the song very well, so I assume that's why she didn't mention it.
But statistically, the most popular "national" hits tend to get mixed in with the local stuff at some point, through sheer ubiquity. Taylor Swift's "Shake It Off" is the most obvious example of this at the moment, a song so popular that it's basically representative of the distinctive listening of humans, or at least of American humans who use Spotify.
For amusement, though, here is a ranking of major US Cities by where on their most-distinctive current song chart "Shake It Off" ranks as of today. The cities at the top are the ones who have surrendered most unreservedly to "Shake It Off", either through genuine disproportionate enthusiasm, and/or because they just don't have anything better of their own to play. The ones at the bottom have maintained the strongest resistance to this invasion. The >100s at the very bottom show the cities where immunity is so strong that "Shake It Off" doesn't even make the top 100 most-distinctive songs.
# | City |
1 | Arlington VA |
1 | Chandler |
1 | Gilbert |
1 | Mesa |
2 | Akron |
2 | Albany |
2 | Anchorage |
2 | Cleveland |
2 | New Haven |
2 | Pasadena |
2 | Tucson |
2 | Worcester |
3 | Alexandria |
3 | Des Moines |
3 | Orange |
3 | Scottsdale |
3 | Vancouver |
3 | Wilmington DE |
4 | Hoboken |
4 | Plano |
4 | Pompano Beach |
5 | Gainesville |
5 | Hartford |
5 | Somerville |
5 | Syracuse |
5 | Tacoma |
5 | Wichita |
6 | Bellevue |
6 | Providence |
6 | Reno |
6 | State College |
7 | Colorado Springs |
7 | Santa Clara |
8 | Aurora |
8 | Little Rock |
9 | Littleton |
9 | Tempe |
10 | East Lansing |
10 | Tampa |
10 | Trenton |
10 | Virginia Beach |
11 | Irvine |
11 | Sunnyvale |
12 | Albuquerque |
12 | Chicago |
13 | Boise |
13 | Boston |
13 | Cambridge |
13 | Las Vegas |
13 | Philadelphia |
13 | Silver Spring |
13 | Spokane |
14 | Dayton |
14 | Jacksonville |
14 | Miami Beach |
14 | Overland Park |
15 | Durham |
15 | Eugene |
15 | Lexington |
15 | St. Louis |
16 | Raleigh |
16 | Washington DC |
17 | Boca Raton |
17 | Springfield MO |
18 | Greensboro |
18 | Greenville |
18 | Spring |
19 | Cincinnati |
19 | Hyattsville |
19 | Murfreesboro |
20 | Fremont |
20 | Fresno |
20 | Ithaca |
20 | Tallahassee |
21 | Bloomington |
21 | Indianapolis |
21 | Pittsburgh |
23 | Corona |
23 | Phoenix |
24 | Frisco |
25 | Columbia MO |
26 | Ann Arbor |
26 | Denton |
26 | San Luis Obispo |
26 | West Palm Beach |
27 | Grand Rapids |
27 | Madison |
27 | Norman |
28 | Norfolk |
29 | Jersey City |
29 | Orlando |
29 | San Jose |
30 | Lawrence |
30 | Louisville |
31 | Bakersfield |
31 | Omaha |
32 | New York |
32 | Richmond |
33 | Salt Lake City |
34 | Columbus |
34 | Lewisville |
34 | Oklahoma City |
35 | Milwaukee |
36 | Wilmington NC |
37 | Columbia SC |
37 | Santa Barbara |
38 | San Diego |
39 | Charleston |
40 | Lincoln |
40 | Toledo |
41 | Long Beach |
41 | Riverside |
41 | St. Paul |
42 | Urbana |
43 | Berkeley |
44 | Katy |
44 | Minneapolis |
45 | Buffalo |
46 | Stockton |
47 | El Paso |
49 | Fort Collins |
54 | Charlotte |
55 | Chapel Hill |
55 | Kansas City |
55 | Knoxville |
55 | Tulsa |
56 | New Orleans |
57 | Denver |
58 | Farmington |
60 | Concord |
60 | San Antonio |
64 | Baton Rouge |
67 | Birmingham |
68 | Hayward |
73 | Mountain View |
81 | Whittier |
83 | Seattle |
85 | Humble |
86 | Atlanta |
86 | Santa Monica |
87 | Grand Prairie |
92 | Memphis |
>100 | APO |
>100 | Anaheim |
>100 | Arlington TX |
>100 | Athens |
>100 | Austin |
>100 | Baltimore |
>100 | Boulder |
>100 | The Bronx |
>100 | Brooklyn |
>100 | College Station |
>100 | Dallas |
>100 | Detroit |
>100 | Fort Lauderdale |
>100 | Fort Worth |
>100 | Hialeah |
>100 | Hollywood FL |
>100 | Honolulu |
>100 | Houston |
>100 | Irving |
>100 | Los Angeles |
>100 | Lubbock |
>100 | Mesquite |
>100 | Miami |
>100 | Nashville |
>100 | Newark |
>100 | Oakland |
>100 | Portland OR |
>100 | Provo |
>100 | Rochester |
>100 | Sacramento |
>100 | San Francisco |
>100 | Santa Ana |
Presumably none of this will bother Taylor, but "people who are not going to listen disproportionately are going to not listen disproportionately" wouldn't fit the meter of the song very well, so I assume that's why she didn't mention it.
¶ City ranks by genre · 15 October 2014 listen/tech
For another way to look at the data from my examination of the distinctive music-listening of US cities, I ranked the top 10 cities by distinctive affiliation to some major genres.
acoustic pop
alternative country
alternative dance
bachata
banda
ccm
chillwave
contemporary country
country
crunk
dance pop
dirty south rap
duranguense
edm
electro house
folk
freak folk
g funk
hip hop
house
hurban
hyphy
indie folk
indie pop
indie rock
indietronica
jam band
jerk
latin
lo-fi
mariachi
norteno
nu gaze
outlaw country
pop
pop punk
progressive bluegrass
r&b
r-neg-b
ranchera
reggaeton
shimmer pop
stomp and holler
synthpop
trap music
west coast rap
worship
This might also be the preface for a volume of sociology essays.
acoustic pop
1 | Spokane |
2 | Knoxville |
3 | Grand Rapids |
4 | St. Paul |
5 | Norman |
6 | Birmingham |
7 | Nashville |
8 | Austin |
9 | Madison |
10 | Athens |
alternative country
1 | Nashville |
2 | Louisville |
3 | Raleigh |
4 | Frisco |
5 | Charleston |
6 | Fort Worth |
7 | Birmingham |
8 | College Station |
9 | Grand Prairie |
10 | Greenville |
alternative dance
1 | San Francisco |
2 | Santa Monica |
3 | Tucson |
4 | New York |
5 | Tempe |
6 | Pasadena |
7 | San Diego |
8 | Gainesville |
9 | Chicago |
10 | San Luis Obispo |
bachata
1 | Newark |
2 | The Bronx |
3 | Jersey City |
4 | Miami |
5 | Hollywood FL |
6 | Brooklyn |
7 | Fort Lauderdale |
8 | Hialeah |
9 | West Palm Beach |
10 | Tampa |
banda
1 | Mountain View |
2 | Mesquite |
3 | Irving |
4 | Newark |
5 | Concord |
6 | Oakland |
7 | Santa Ana |
8 | Anaheim |
9 | Bakersfield |
10 | Los Angeles |
ccm
1 | Springfield MO |
2 | Grand Rapids |
3 | Oklahoma City |
4 | Spokane |
5 | Birmingham |
6 | Tulsa |
7 | St. Paul |
8 | Colorado Springs |
9 | Knoxville |
10 | Norman |
chillwave
1 | San Francisco |
2 | Santa Monica |
3 | Portland OR |
4 | Seattle |
5 | Brooklyn |
6 | New York |
7 | Pasadena |
8 | New Orleans |
9 | Berkeley |
10 | San Diego |
contemporary country
1 | Des Moines |
2 | Lincoln |
3 | Omaha |
4 | Indianapolis |
5 | Columbia MO |
6 | Akron |
7 | APO |
8 | Dayton |
9 | Lexington |
10 | Albuquerque |
country
1 | APO |
2 | Indianapolis |
3 | Akron |
4 | Albuquerque |
5 | Des Moines |
6 | Omaha |
7 | Columbia MO |
8 | Lincoln |
9 | San Antonio |
10 | Dayton |
crunk
1 | Humble |
2 | Katy |
3 | Houston |
4 | Charlotte |
5 | Orlando |
6 | Baton Rouge |
7 | Farmington |
8 | Memphis |
9 | Irving |
10 | Tampa |
dance pop
1 | Baltimore |
2 | Greensboro |
3 | Detroit |
4 | Las Vegas |
5 | Philadelphia |
6 | Gilbert |
7 | Pompano Beach |
8 | Trenton |
9 | Wilmington DE |
10 | Atlanta |
dirty south rap
1 | Humble |
2 | Katy |
3 | Houston |
4 | Charlotte |
5 | Atlanta |
6 | Irving |
7 | Orlando |
8 | Farmington |
9 | Memphis |
10 | Arlington TX |
duranguense
1 | Mesquite |
2 | Irving |
3 | Mountain View |
4 | Arlington TX |
5 | Dallas |
6 | Newark |
7 | Jersey City |
8 | Concord |
9 | Houston |
10 | Oakland |
edm
1 | Irvine |
2 | Hoboken |
3 | San Jose |
4 | Fremont |
5 | Santa Clara |
6 | Berkeley |
7 | State College |
8 | Reno |
9 | Sunnyvale |
10 | Bellevue |
electro house
1 | Hoboken |
2 | Irvine |
3 | San Jose |
4 | Fremont |
5 | Santa Clara |
6 | Berkeley |
7 | New York |
8 | State College |
9 | Boston |
10 | Sunnyvale |
folk
1 | Nashville |
2 | Charleston |
3 | Louisville |
4 | Raleigh |
5 | Portland OR |
6 | Chapel Hill |
7 | Birmingham |
8 | Greenville |
9 | Knoxville |
10 | Wilmington NC |
freak folk
1 | Portland OR |
2 | Brooklyn |
3 | Seattle |
4 | Cambridge |
5 | San Francisco |
6 | Somerville |
7 | Santa Monica |
8 | Athens |
9 | Austin |
10 | Denton |
g funk
1 | Hayward |
2 | Concord |
3 | Oakland |
4 | Sacramento |
5 | Stockton |
6 | San Jose |
7 | Fresno |
8 | Fremont |
9 | Los Angeles |
10 | Whittier |
hip hop
1 | Hartford |
2 | Silver Spring |
3 | Worcester |
4 | Ann Arbor |
5 | Farmington |
6 | Philadelphia |
7 | Wilmington DE |
8 | Tampa |
9 | Boca Raton |
10 | Hyattsville |
house
1 | Hoboken |
2 | Irvine |
3 | San Jose |
4 | Fremont |
5 | Santa Clara |
6 | Berkeley |
7 | State College |
8 | Sunnyvale |
9 | Reno |
10 | Orange |
hurban
1 | Miami |
2 | Hollywood FL |
3 | Hialeah |
4 | Fort Lauderdale |
5 | Newark |
6 | West Palm Beach |
7 | Jersey City |
8 | The Bronx |
9 | El Paso |
10 | Miami Beach |
hyphy
1 | Concord |
2 | Hayward |
3 | Sacramento |
4 | Stockton |
5 | Oakland |
6 | Fresno |
7 | San Jose |
8 | Fremont |
9 | Santa Clara |
10 | San Francisco |
indie folk
1 | Portland OR |
2 | Somerville |
3 | Cambridge |
4 | Madison |
5 | Eugene |
6 | Spokane |
7 | Louisville |
8 | Milwaukee |
9 | New Haven |
10 | Durham |
indie pop
1 | Portland OR |
2 | Somerville |
3 | Austin |
4 | Cambridge |
5 | Chicago |
6 | New Orleans |
7 | Seattle |
8 | Eugene |
9 | Lawrence |
10 | Milwaukee |
indie rock
1 | Portland OR |
2 | Chicago |
3 | Cambridge |
4 | Somerville |
5 | Seattle |
6 | Austin |
7 | Columbus |
8 | Tempe |
9 | San Diego |
10 | St. Louis |
indietronica
1 | Santa Monica |
2 | San Francisco |
3 | Portland OR |
4 | Seattle |
5 | New York |
6 | San Diego |
7 | Bellevue |
8 | Pasadena |
9 | Anchorage |
10 | Brooklyn |
jam band
1 | Boulder |
2 | Athens |
3 | Denver |
4 | Fort Collins |
5 | Charleston |
6 | Birmingham |
7 | Columbia SC |
8 | Baton Rouge |
9 | New Orleans |
10 | Wilmington NC |
jerk
1 | Stockton |
2 | Hayward |
3 | Sacramento |
4 | Oakland |
5 | Concord |
6 | Fremont |
7 | Corona |
8 | San Jose |
9 | Bakersfield |
10 | Phoenix |
latin
1 | El Paso |
2 | Miami |
3 | Hialeah |
4 | Miami Beach |
5 | Hollywood FL |
6 | Fort Lauderdale |
7 | Boca Raton |
8 | West Palm Beach |
9 | Mesquite |
10 | Jersey City |
lo-fi
1 | Portland OR |
2 | Austin |
3 | Seattle |
4 | Cambridge |
5 | Chicago |
6 | Somerville |
7 | Brooklyn |
8 | Santa Monica |
9 | Cincinnati |
10 | Louisville |
mariachi
1 | Mountain View |
2 | Newark |
3 | Mesquite |
4 | Irving |
5 | Concord |
6 | Jersey City |
7 | Oakland |
8 | Santa Ana |
9 | El Paso |
10 | Dallas |
norteno
1 | Mountain View |
2 | Mesquite |
3 | Irving |
4 | Newark |
5 | Concord |
6 | Oakland |
7 | Santa Ana |
8 | Anaheim |
9 | Bakersfield |
10 | Houston |
nu gaze
1 | Portland OR |
2 | Brooklyn |
3 | Santa Monica |
4 | Seattle |
5 | San Francisco |
6 | San Diego |
7 | Pasadena |
8 | Lawrence |
9 | New Orleans |
10 | New York |
outlaw country
1 | Fort Worth |
2 | Grand Prairie |
3 | Frisco |
4 | College Station |
5 | Lewisville |
6 | Lubbock |
7 | Spring |
8 | Dallas |
9 | San Antonio |
10 | Arlington TX |
pop
1 | Gilbert |
2 | Pompano Beach |
3 | Chandler |
4 | Trenton |
5 | Las Vegas |
6 | Plano |
7 | Santa Clara |
8 | Anchorage |
9 | Vancouver |
10 | Fresno |
pop punk
1 | Mesa |
2 | Virginia Beach |
3 | Trenton |
4 | Chandler |
5 | Buffalo |
6 | Gilbert |
7 | Pittsburgh |
8 | Tucson |
9 | Colorado Springs |
10 | East Lansing |
progressive bluegrass
1 | Denver |
2 | Boulder |
3 | Fort Collins |
4 | Raleigh |
5 | Charleston |
6 | Knoxville |
7 | Chapel Hill |
8 | Greenville |
9 | Louisville |
10 | Nashville |
r&b
1 | Baltimore |
2 | Detroit |
3 | Atlanta |
4 | Greensboro |
5 | Memphis |
6 | Philadelphia |
7 | Hyattsville |
8 | Richmond |
9 | Norfolk |
10 | Las Vegas |
r-neg-b
1 | San Francisco |
2 | Santa Monica |
3 | New York |
4 | Brooklyn |
5 | Providence |
6 | Seattle |
7 | Pasadena |
8 | Portland OR |
9 | Baltimore |
10 | Hyattsville |
ranchera
1 | Mountain View |
2 | Newark |
3 | Mesquite |
4 | Irving |
5 | Concord |
6 | Jersey City |
7 | Oakland |
8 | Santa Ana |
9 | Dallas |
10 | Los Angeles |
reggaeton
1 | Hialeah |
2 | Miami |
3 | Hollywood FL |
4 | Fort Lauderdale |
5 | West Palm Beach |
6 | Orlando |
7 | Boca Raton |
8 | Miami Beach |
9 | Tampa |
10 | Jersey City |
shimmer pop
1 | St. Louis |
2 | Santa Monica |
3 | Lawrence |
4 | San Francisco |
5 | Kansas City |
6 | Overland Park |
7 | Littleton |
8 | Colorado Springs |
9 | Aurora |
10 | Bellevue |
stomp and holler
1 | Portland OR |
2 | Somerville |
3 | Louisville |
4 | Minneapolis |
5 | Wilmington NC |
6 | Cambridge |
7 | Eugene |
8 | Madison |
9 | Milwaukee |
10 | Spokane |
synthpop
1 | San Francisco |
2 | Santa Monica |
3 | New York |
4 | Tucson |
5 | Pasadena |
6 | San Diego |
7 | Tempe |
8 | Bellevue |
9 | Chicago |
10 | Gainesville |
trap music
1 | Charlotte |
2 | Memphis |
3 | Humble |
4 | Richmond |
5 | Farmington |
6 | Silver Spring |
7 | Orlando |
8 | Toledo |
9 | Baton Rouge |
10 | Katy |
west coast rap
1 | Hayward |
2 | Concord |
3 | Sacramento |
4 | Oakland |
5 | Stockton |
6 | San Jose |
7 | Fresno |
8 | Fremont |
9 | Los Angeles |
10 | Whittier |
worship
1 | Springfield MO |
2 | Grand Rapids |
3 | Spokane |
4 | Tulsa |
5 | Birmingham |
6 | St. Paul |
7 | Oklahoma City |
8 | Greenville |
9 | Knoxville |
10 | Murfreesboro |
This might also be the preface for a volume of sociology essays.
¶ Sounds in Color · 8 October 2014 listen/tech
Every Noise at Once has long existed in shades of gray. This isn't because I don't like colors. I've actually tried a few different ways to add color, mostly through inelegant expedients, but none of them seemed to me to be adding more clarity than confusion.
I'm not entirely certain this one doesn't also suffer that flaw, but in the spirit of experimentation, I'm going to go ahead and publish it. If it makes us unhappy, I can always go back to gray. So here:
The idea is to semi-subliminally surface some of the other analytical dimensions from the underlying music space, beyond the two that drive the XY axes, so that there's a little less visual flattening.
For example, in the section on the right, above, you can see the reddish color running from "garage punk blues" to "experimental rock" to "more classic garage rock" and "psychedelic blues-rock", and the light blue linking "alternative new age" to "abstract" to "new tribe". These are good associative threads.
And the maps within each genre (psychedelic blues-rock on the left, below, and abstract on the right) show both overall corresponding tints, and variable degrees of internal uniformity:
Logistically, this works by mapping three additional acoustic metrics into the red, green and blue color-channels. I arrived at this particular combination through not-at-all-exhaustive experimentation, so maybe I'll come up with a better one, but for the moment red is energy, green is dynamic variation, and blue is instrumentalness. I don't recommend trying to think too hard about this, as the combinatory effects are kind of hard to parse, but it gives your eye things to follow. As data-presentation this is rather undisciplined, but as computational evocation it seems potentially interesting nonetheless.
Which you could say of music, too.
I'm not entirely certain this one doesn't also suffer that flaw, but in the spirit of experimentation, I'm going to go ahead and publish it. If it makes us unhappy, I can always go back to gray. So here:
The idea is to semi-subliminally surface some of the other analytical dimensions from the underlying music space, beyond the two that drive the XY axes, so that there's a little less visual flattening.
For example, in the section on the right, above, you can see the reddish color running from "garage punk blues" to "experimental rock" to "more classic garage rock" and "psychedelic blues-rock", and the light blue linking "alternative new age" to "abstract" to "new tribe". These are good associative threads.
And the maps within each genre (psychedelic blues-rock on the left, below, and abstract on the right) show both overall corresponding tints, and variable degrees of internal uniformity:
Logistically, this works by mapping three additional acoustic metrics into the red, green and blue color-channels. I arrived at this particular combination through not-at-all-exhaustive experimentation, so maybe I'll come up with a better one, but for the moment red is energy, green is dynamic variation, and blue is instrumentalness. I don't recommend trying to think too hard about this, as the combinatory effects are kind of hard to parse, but it gives your eye things to follow. As data-presentation this is rather undisciplined, but as computational evocation it seems potentially interesting nonetheless.
Which you could say of music, too.
¶ Post-Neo-Traditional Pop Post-Thing · 29 September 2014 essay/listen/tech
As part of a conference on Music and Genre at McGill University in Montreal, over this past weekend, I served as the non-academic curiosity at the center of a round-table discussion about the nature of musical genres, and of the natures of efforts to understand genres, and of the natures of efforts to understand the efforts to understand genres. Plus or minus one or two levels of abstraction, I forget exactly.
My "talk" to open this conversation was not strictly scripted to begin with, and I ended up rewriting my oblique speaking notes more or less over from scratch as the day was going on, anyway. One section, which I added as I listened to other people talk about the kinds of distinctions that "genres" represent, attempted to list some of the kinds of genres I have in my deliberately multi-definitional genre map. There ended up being so many of these that I mentioned only a selection of them during the talk. So here, for extended (potential) amusement, is the whole list I had on my screen:
Kinds of Genres
(And note that this isn't even one kind of kind of genre...)
- conventional genre (jazz, reggae)
- subgenre (calypso, sega, samba, barbershop)
- region (malaysian pop, lithumania)
- language (rock en espanol, hip hop tuga, telugu, malayalam)
- historical distance (vintage swing, traditional country)
- scene (slc indie, canterbury scene, juggalo, usbm)
- faction (east coast hip hop, west coast rap)
- aesthetic (ninja, complextro, funeral doom)
- politics (riot grrrl, vegan straight edge, unblack metal)
- aspirational identity (viking metal, gangster rap, skinhead oi, twee pop)
- retrospective clarity (protopunk, classic peruvian pop, emo punk)
- jokes that stuck (crack rock steady, chamber pop, fourth world)
- influence (britpop, italo disco, japanoise)
- micro-feud (dubstep, brostep, filthstep, trapstep)
- technology (c64, harp)
- totem (digeridu, new tribe, throat singing, metal guitar)
- isolationism (faeroese pop, lds, wrock)
- editorial precedent (c86, zolo, illbient)
- utility (meditation, chill-out, workout, belly dance)
- cultural (christmas, children's music, judaica)
- occasional (discofox, qawaali, disco polo)
- implicit politics (chalga, nsbm, dangdut)
- commerce (coverchill, guidance)
- assumed listening perspective (beatdown, worship, comic)
- private community (orgcore, ectofolk)
- dominant features (hip hop, metal, reggaeton)
- period (early music, ska revival)
- perspective of provenance (classical (composers), orchestral (performers))
- emergent self-identity (skweee, progressive rock)
- external label (moombahton, laboratorio, fallen angel)
- gender (boy band, girl group)
- distribution (viral pop, idol, commons, anime score, show tunes)
- cultural institution (tin pan alley, brill building pop, nashville sound)
- mechanism (mashup, hauntology, vaporwave)
- radio format (album rock, quiet storm, hurban)
- multiple dimensions (german ccm, hindustani classical)
- marketing (world music, lounge, modern classical, new age)
- performer demographics (military band, british brass band)
- arrangement (jazz trio, jug band, wind ensemble)
- competing terminology (hip hop, rap; mpb, brazilian pop music)
- intentions (tribute, fake)
- introspective fractality (riddim, deep house, chaotic black metal)
- opposition (alternative rock, r-neg-b, progressive bluegrass)
- otherness (noise, oratory, lowercase, abstract, outsider)
- parallel terminology (gothic symphonic metal, gothic americana, gothic post-punk; garage rock, uk garage)
- non-self-explanatory (fingerstyle, footwork, futurepop, jungle)
- invented distinctions (shimmer pop, shiver pop; soul flow, flick hop)
- nostalgia (new wave, no wave, new jack swing, avant-garde, adult standards)
- defense (relaxative, neo mellow)
That was at the beginning of the talk. At the end I had a different attempt at an amusement prepared, which was a short outline of my mental draft of the paper I would write about genre evolution, if I wrote papers. In a way this is also a way of listing kinds of kinds of things:
The Every-Noise-at-Once Unified Theory of Musical Genre Evolution
And it would be awesome.
[Also, although I was the one glaringly anomalous non-academic at this academic conference, let posterity record the cover of the conference program.]
My "talk" to open this conversation was not strictly scripted to begin with, and I ended up rewriting my oblique speaking notes more or less over from scratch as the day was going on, anyway. One section, which I added as I listened to other people talk about the kinds of distinctions that "genres" represent, attempted to list some of the kinds of genres I have in my deliberately multi-definitional genre map. There ended up being so many of these that I mentioned only a selection of them during the talk. So here, for extended (potential) amusement, is the whole list I had on my screen:
Kinds of Genres
(And note that this isn't even one kind of kind of genre...)
- conventional genre (jazz, reggae)
- subgenre (calypso, sega, samba, barbershop)
- region (malaysian pop, lithumania)
- language (rock en espanol, hip hop tuga, telugu, malayalam)
- historical distance (vintage swing, traditional country)
- scene (slc indie, canterbury scene, juggalo, usbm)
- faction (east coast hip hop, west coast rap)
- aesthetic (ninja, complextro, funeral doom)
- politics (riot grrrl, vegan straight edge, unblack metal)
- aspirational identity (viking metal, gangster rap, skinhead oi, twee pop)
- retrospective clarity (protopunk, classic peruvian pop, emo punk)
- jokes that stuck (crack rock steady, chamber pop, fourth world)
- influence (britpop, italo disco, japanoise)
- micro-feud (dubstep, brostep, filthstep, trapstep)
- technology (c64, harp)
- totem (digeridu, new tribe, throat singing, metal guitar)
- isolationism (faeroese pop, lds, wrock)
- editorial precedent (c86, zolo, illbient)
- utility (meditation, chill-out, workout, belly dance)
- cultural (christmas, children's music, judaica)
- occasional (discofox, qawaali, disco polo)
- implicit politics (chalga, nsbm, dangdut)
- commerce (coverchill, guidance)
- assumed listening perspective (beatdown, worship, comic)
- private community (orgcore, ectofolk)
- dominant features (hip hop, metal, reggaeton)
- period (early music, ska revival)
- perspective of provenance (classical (composers), orchestral (performers))
- emergent self-identity (skweee, progressive rock)
- external label (moombahton, laboratorio, fallen angel)
- gender (boy band, girl group)
- distribution (viral pop, idol, commons, anime score, show tunes)
- cultural institution (tin pan alley, brill building pop, nashville sound)
- mechanism (mashup, hauntology, vaporwave)
- radio format (album rock, quiet storm, hurban)
- multiple dimensions (german ccm, hindustani classical)
- marketing (world music, lounge, modern classical, new age)
- performer demographics (military band, british brass band)
- arrangement (jazz trio, jug band, wind ensemble)
- competing terminology (hip hop, rap; mpb, brazilian pop music)
- intentions (tribute, fake)
- introspective fractality (riddim, deep house, chaotic black metal)
- opposition (alternative rock, r-neg-b, progressive bluegrass)
- otherness (noise, oratory, lowercase, abstract, outsider)
- parallel terminology (gothic symphonic metal, gothic americana, gothic post-punk; garage rock, uk garage)
- non-self-explanatory (fingerstyle, footwork, futurepop, jungle)
- invented distinctions (shimmer pop, shiver pop; soul flow, flick hop)
- nostalgia (new wave, no wave, new jack swing, avant-garde, adult standards)
- defense (relaxative, neo mellow)
That was at the beginning of the talk. At the end I had a different attempt at an amusement prepared, which was a short outline of my mental draft of the paper I would write about genre evolution, if I wrote papers. In a way this is also a way of listing kinds of kinds of things:
The Every-Noise-at-Once Unified Theory of Musical Genre Evolution
- There is a status quo;
- Somebody becomes dissatisfied with it;
- Several somebodies find common ground in their various dissatisfactions;
- Somebody gives this common ground a name, and now we have Thing;
- The people who made thing before it was called Thing are now joined by people who know Thing as it is named, and have thus set out to make Thing deliberately, and now we have Thing and Modern Thing, or else Classic Thing and Thing, depending on whether it happened before or after we graduated from college;
- Eventually there's enough gravity around Thing for people to start trying to make Thing that doesn't get sucked into the rest of Thing, and thus we get Alternative Thing, which is the non-Thing thing that some people know about, and Deep Thing, which is the non-Thing thing that only the people who make Deep Thing know;
- By now we can retroactively identify Proto-Thing, which is the stuff before Thing that sounds kind of thingy to us now that we know Thing;
- Thing eventually gets reintegrated into the mainstream, and we get Pop Thing;
- Pop Thing tarnishes the whole affair for some people, who head off grumpily into Post Thing;
- But Post Thing is kind of dreary, and some people set out to restore the original sense of whatever it was, and we get Neo-Thing;
- Except Neo-Thing isn't quite the same as the original Thing, so we get Neo-Traditional Thing, for people who wish none of this ever happened except the original Thing;
- But Neo-Thing and Neo-Traditional Thing are both kind of precious, and some people who like Thing still also want to be rock stars, and so we get Nu Thing;
- And this is all kind of fractal, so you could search-and-replace Thing with Post Thing or Pop Thing or whatever, and after a couple iterations you can quickly end up with Post-Neo-Traditional Pop Post-Thing.
And it would be awesome.
[Also, although I was the one glaringly anomalous non-academic at this academic conference, let posterity record the cover of the conference program.]
¶ The Sounds of Places · 17 September 2014 listen/tech
At Spotify, where I work, we have listeners in a large and growing numbers of countries around the world. You might theorize that people in different countries listen to different music. You might be curious to hear this music. If you are me, you might be really curious, to the point of a kind of obsessive, consuming fear that there is awesome and bizarre and wonderful music in, say, Estonia, that you're not hearing.
We do, in fact, have per-country top-track charts in Spotify itself. These measure the absolute popularity of tracks among the sub-population listening in a given country. Statistically, though, these charts tend to be fairly well dominated by global hits. This isn't a technical flaw, but it does mean that those charts are not especially useful for the purpose of musical tourism. When I say I want to hear what they're listening to in Estonia, I mean that I want to hear what they're listening to Estonia that, proportionally speaking, nobody is listening to anywhere else. I want to hear the music that is most uniquely Estonian, or more precisely the music that is most uniquely loved by Estonians.
So I've been experimenting with code to generate the kind of additional alternate chart that I mean, measuring the most distinctive listening of a country. It's not perfect, and the occasional global hit wanders in due to emotionally irrelevant factors like regional licensing contingencies. But for the most part these charts do appear to be rather effectively getting past the global to the local.
I was going to share an alphabetized list of these, for anybody who shares my curiosity. But I have this code to produce visual maps of music groupings, and it's just as easy to feed it countries as it is to feed it genres. And thus I've done the somewhat bizarre exercise of producing a visual remapping of inherently geographic data using non-geographic coordinates.
This sounds silly, I think. But it turns out to be surprisingly interesting. Here's the map:
This is a readability-adjusted scatter-plot of two acoustic variables averaged across a few thousand of the most popular and representative songs from each country.
The vertical axis is a metric quality we call "bounciness", so the countries at the top are characterized by denser and more atmospheric music, and the countries at the bottom are characterized by sparer music with spikier beats and more space between them. E.g., the constant roar of atmospheric black metal or the slow humming whir of classical organ music would be at the top, and the jumpy beats of hip hop or the pulse of reggae would be at the bottom.
The horizontal axis is another score we call "organism". The countries towards the left are characterized by music with more electric arrangements and/or more mechanical rhythms. The extreme of this quality gets you relentless techno. The countries towards the right are characterized by music with more acoustic arrangements and/or more human and variable rhythms. The extremes of this get you jigs and reels, or sitars.
[The main genre map is the other way around, with bounciness from left to right, and organism up and down, but this way we get Scandinavia at the non-geographic north, and China and India towards the non-geographic east!]
But what's intriguing here, obviously, is not where individual countries appear, but which countries cluster together. Japan, Australia and Canada all basically fall into acoustic Scandinavia. Africa and the Caribbean form a unified acoustic southern hemisphere. Malaysia is acoustically closer to Slovakia than to China, and Lebanon is acoustically closer to South Korea and Mexico than to Iran. I feel like we are detecting at least the faint echoes of a kind of cultural truth.
Click any country to see the calculated playlist of the 100 most distinctively popular songs in that country. You need Spotify for this to work, and as you'll discover, in some cases international publishing rights work counter to personal curiosity, and less than 100 will actually be available for you to stream. If you're extra-curious, in Spotify Preferences you can uncheck "Hide unplayable tracks", and then you'll at least get to see all 100.
Estonia turns out to be pretty much exactly as awesome as I imagined it had to be if I could only hear it.
We do, in fact, have per-country top-track charts in Spotify itself. These measure the absolute popularity of tracks among the sub-population listening in a given country. Statistically, though, these charts tend to be fairly well dominated by global hits. This isn't a technical flaw, but it does mean that those charts are not especially useful for the purpose of musical tourism. When I say I want to hear what they're listening to in Estonia, I mean that I want to hear what they're listening to Estonia that, proportionally speaking, nobody is listening to anywhere else. I want to hear the music that is most uniquely Estonian, or more precisely the music that is most uniquely loved by Estonians.
So I've been experimenting with code to generate the kind of additional alternate chart that I mean, measuring the most distinctive listening of a country. It's not perfect, and the occasional global hit wanders in due to emotionally irrelevant factors like regional licensing contingencies. But for the most part these charts do appear to be rather effectively getting past the global to the local.
I was going to share an alphabetized list of these, for anybody who shares my curiosity. But I have this code to produce visual maps of music groupings, and it's just as easy to feed it countries as it is to feed it genres. And thus I've done the somewhat bizarre exercise of producing a visual remapping of inherently geographic data using non-geographic coordinates.
This sounds silly, I think. But it turns out to be surprisingly interesting. Here's the map:
This is a readability-adjusted scatter-plot of two acoustic variables averaged across a few thousand of the most popular and representative songs from each country.
The vertical axis is a metric quality we call "bounciness", so the countries at the top are characterized by denser and more atmospheric music, and the countries at the bottom are characterized by sparer music with spikier beats and more space between them. E.g., the constant roar of atmospheric black metal or the slow humming whir of classical organ music would be at the top, and the jumpy beats of hip hop or the pulse of reggae would be at the bottom.
The horizontal axis is another score we call "organism". The countries towards the left are characterized by music with more electric arrangements and/or more mechanical rhythms. The extreme of this quality gets you relentless techno. The countries towards the right are characterized by music with more acoustic arrangements and/or more human and variable rhythms. The extremes of this get you jigs and reels, or sitars.
[The main genre map is the other way around, with bounciness from left to right, and organism up and down, but this way we get Scandinavia at the non-geographic north, and China and India towards the non-geographic east!]
But what's intriguing here, obviously, is not where individual countries appear, but which countries cluster together. Japan, Australia and Canada all basically fall into acoustic Scandinavia. Africa and the Caribbean form a unified acoustic southern hemisphere. Malaysia is acoustically closer to Slovakia than to China, and Lebanon is acoustically closer to South Korea and Mexico than to Iran. I feel like we are detecting at least the faint echoes of a kind of cultural truth.
Click any country to see the calculated playlist of the 100 most distinctively popular songs in that country. You need Spotify for this to work, and as you'll discover, in some cases international publishing rights work counter to personal curiosity, and less than 100 will actually be available for you to stream. If you're extra-curious, in Spotify Preferences you can uncheck "Hide unplayable tracks", and then you'll at least get to see all 100.
Estonia turns out to be pretty much exactly as awesome as I imagined it had to be if I could only hear it.
We used to call playlists "compilations", and they used to be published on big flat pieces of plastic. Weird.
The one that formed the core of my personal education in "punk" music was a 1984 double-LP from Cherry Red records called Burning Ambitions: A History of Punk.
This comp itself is not available on Spotify. All but one of the songs are, though, in one form or another, so I have reconstructed it for posterity:
The one that formed the core of my personal education in "punk" music was a 1984 double-LP from Cherry Red records called Burning Ambitions: A History of Punk.
This comp itself is not available on Spotify. All but one of the songs are, though, in one form or another, so I have reconstructed it for posterity:
¶ The Point of a Map Is to Travel · 4 September 2014 listen/tech
The Guardian today published a piece by Rob Fitzpatrick that I think is now my favorite thing written about my genre map, because instead of being about the map, it's about the music he found using the map.